Koty Psy Chirurgia

Metody szycia oraz proces gojenia powłok brzusznych u psów i kotów

05/07/2023

SUMMARY

Suturing techniques and healing of the abdominal wall in dogs and cats

An increasing number of animals are undergoing abdominal surgery multiple times during their lifetime. Surgical wounds are routinely closed by placing several tiers of continuous or interrupted sutures (1-4 layers). Each technique has certain advantages and disadvantages. This article reviews the current literature on the impact of suturing techniques on abdominal wall healing and strength.

Key words: sutures, healing, evisceration, tensile strength

PIŚMIENNICTWO

1. Toombs J.P., Clarke M.K.: Basic Operative Techniques. W: Textbook of Small Animel Surgery (ed. Slatter, D.) (Saunders, 2003).

2. Tarasewicz W.: Sposoby szycia powłok brzusznych u psów. Med Weter XIX.

3. Koch D.: Dobór materiałów do szycia w chirurgii małych zwierząt. Magazyn Weterynaryjny, 2011, 07.

4. Bushby P., White S.: Dog Spay/Cat Spay. W: High-Quality, High-Volume Spay and Neuter and Other Shelter Surgeries. Ed. White S., Wiley Blackwell, 2020, 241-267.

5. Żakiewicz M.: Jama brzuszna. W: Chirurgia małych zwierząt, Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, 1994, 246-267.

6. Crowe D.T.: Closure of Abdominal Incisions Using A Continuous Polypropylene Suture: Clinical Experience in 550 Dogs and Cats.

7. Phillips S.J.: Physiology of wound healing and surgical wound care. ASAIO J, 2000, 46.

8. Wallace H.A., Basehore B.M., Zito P.M.: Wound Healing Phases. StatPearls, 2023.

9. Dizerega G.S., Campeau J.D.: Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation.

10. Fossum T.W.: Zabiegi chirurgicznej jamy brzusznej. W: Chirurgia Małych Zwierząt, eds. Dewey C.W. i wsp., vol. 2, Elsevier, 2014, 386-417.

11. Laumonier T., Menetrey J.: Muscle injuries and strategies for improving their repair. J Exp Orthop, 2016, 3.

12. Jiang D., Rinkevich Y.: Furnishing Wound Repair by the Subcutaneous Fascia. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22.

13. Meakin L.B. i wsp.: Electrosurgery reduces blood loss and immediate postoperative inflammation compared to cold instruments for midline celiotomy in dogs: A randomized controlled trial. Veterinary Surgery, 2017, 46, 515.

14. Stanley B.J., Cornell K.: Wound Healing. W: Veterinary Surgery Small Animal, eds. Johnston S.A., Tobias K.M., Elsevier, 2018, vol. 1, 132-148.

15. Reinke J.M., Sorg H.: Wound repair and regeneration. Eur Surg Res, 2012, 49, 35-43.

16. Meakin L.B. i wsp.: Electrosurgery reduces blood loss and immediate postoperative inflammation compared to cold instruments for midline celiotomy in dogs: A randomized controlled trial. Vet Surg, 2017, 46, 515-519.

17. Bowers C.A., Burns G., Salzman K.L., McGill L.D., MacDonald J.D.: Comparison of tissue effects in rabbit muscle of surgical dissection devices. Int J Surg, 2014, 12, 219-223.

18. Reina Rodriguez F.S., Buckley C.T., Milgram J., Kirby B.M.: Biomechanical properties of feline ventral abdominal wall and celiotomy closure techniques. Veterinary Surgery, 2018, 47, 193-203.

19. Bartier A.L., Atilla A., Archer R., Kwong G.P.S.: Optimal Suture Bite Size for Closure of Feline Linea Alba – A Cadaveric Study. Front Vet Sci, 2019, 6, 441.

20. Fahie M.A.: Skin and Reconstruction. W: Veterinary Surgery Small Animal, eds. Johnston S.A., Tobias K.M., Elsevier, 2012, vol. 2, 1397-1410.

21. Kitshoff A.M. i wsp.: Biomechanical properties of celiotomy wounds closed with tape and cyanoacrylate versus intradermal sutures. Vet Surg, 2018, 47, 1087-1093.

22. Galanty M., Trębacz P., Żakiewicz M., Max A., Sapierzyński R.: Operacje na narządach jamy brzusznej. W: Chirurgia małych zwierząt. Brzuch i miednica. Ed. Galanty M., Powszechne Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, 2013, 19-35.

23. Kumagai S.G. i wsp.: Effects of electrocautery on midline laparotomy wound infection. Am J Surg, 1991, 162, 620-623.

24. Biler A. i wsp.: Is it safe to have multiple repeat cesarean sections? A high volume tertiary care center experience. Pak J Med Sci, 2017, 33, 1074.

25. Hollinsky C., Sandberg S.: Measurement of the tensile strength of the ventral abdominal wall in comparison with scar tissue. Clin Biomech, Bristol, Avon, 2007, 22, 88-92.

26. Sylvestre A., Wilson J., Hare J.: A comparison of 2 different suture patterns for skin closure of canine ovariohysterectomy. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 2002, 43, 699.

27. Papazoglou L.G. i wsp.: Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 2010, 51, 770.

28. Court M.H., Bellenger C.R.: Comparison of Adhesive Polyurethane Membrane and Polypropylene Sutures for Closure of Skin Incisions in Cats. Veterinary Surgery, 1989, 18, 211-215.

29. Bohling M.W., Henderson R.A., Swaim S.F., Kincaid S.A., Wright J.C.: Cutaneous Wound Healing in the Cat: A Macroscopic Description and Comparison with Cutaneous Wound Healing in the Dog. Veterinary Surgery, 2004, 33, 579-587.

30. Schmiedt C.W.: Suture Material, Tissue Staplers, Ligation Devices, and Closure Methods. W: Veterinary Surgery Small Animal, eds. Johnston S.A., Tobias K.M., Elsevier, 2018, vol. 1, 210-224.

31. Kummeling A., van Sluijs F.J.: Closure of the rectus sheath with a continuous looped suture and the skin with staples in dogs: Speed, safety, and costs compared to closure of the rectus sheath with interrupted sutures and the skin with a continuous subdermal suture. Veterinary Quarterly, 1998, 20, 126-130.

32. Kirpensteijn J. i wsp.: Comparison of stainless steel fascial staples and polypropylene suture material for closure of the linea alba in dogs. Vet Surg, 1993, 22, 464-472.

33. Gates M.C., Littlewood K.E., Kongara K., Odom T.F., Sawicki R.K.: Cross-sectional survey of surgical techniques used to perform dog and cat spays in New Zealand veterinary practice. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2019, doi:10.1080/00480169.2019.1665594.

34. Richter D. i wsp.: A comparison of a new skin closure device and intradermal sutures in the closure of full-thickness surgical incisions. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2012, 130, 843-850.

35. Sabol F. i wsp.: Intradermal running suture versus 3MTM VetbondTM tissue adhesive for wound closure in rodents: a biomechanical and histological study. Eur Surg Res, 2010, 45, 321-326.

36. Ladlow J.: Hemorrhage. W: Complications in Small Animal Surgery, eds. Griffon D., Hamaide A., Wiley Backwell, 2016, 72-79.

37. Shaver S.L., Larrosa M., Hofmeister E.H.: Factors affecting the duration of anesthesia and surgery of canine and feline gonadectomies performed by veterinary students in a year-long preclinical surgery laboratory. Veterinary Surgery, 2019, 48, 352-359.

38. Bohling M.W.: Complications in Spay and Neuter Surgery. W: High-Quality, High-Volume Spay and Neuter and Other Shelter Surgeries, ed. White S., Wiley Blackwell, 2019, 339-363.

39. Claeys S.: Dehiscence. W: Complications in Small Animal Surgery, eds. Griffon D., Hamaide A., Wiley Blackwell, 2016, 57-64.

40. Latinen-Vapaavuori O.: Surgical Wound Infections. W: Complications in Small Animal Surgery, eds. Griffon D., Hamaide A., Wiley Blackwell, 2016, vol. 1, 3-8.

41. Doom M., de Rooster H.: Peritonitis. W: Complications in Small Animal Surgery, eds. Griffon D., Hamaide A., Wiley Blackwell, 2016, 20-28.